Main Article Content

Abstract

In this modern and in age of industrial era 4.0 that was fostered by COVID-19 pandemic the challenge of increasing employee productivity is the main key to company success. One of the predictors of work performance for office workers are the use of computer aids such as keyboard and mouse. This study aims to explore how keyboard and mouse usage behavior affects work performance. The study shows that in the IoT era, poor predictability of work-related behavior from the use of computer accessories is encouraged. The sampling technique with accidental sampling, distributing 100 questionnaires to the target respondents giving the respond rates of 76% respondents using several survey techniques. The instruments use is developed from previous studies that prove to be effective in asking the perception of respondents. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression, simple linear regression, and correlation through the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27. The findings of this study revealed that keyboard usage behavior plays a significant and positive role in influencing work performance. In contrast, mouse usage behavior was not found to have a significant impact on work performance. This may be because some employees have other alternatives compared to using a mouse, namely a touchpad. Several recommendations for organization that employed office workers that mostly rely on computer for their work is posed to support work performance. This study is the bridging study to computer related study that can measures the productivity, and others work performance variables using more specific IoT tools such as sensors that enable to more accurate results better than perception study.

Keywords

Use Behaviour Mouse use Behaviour Work Performance Multiple Regression Analysis Internet of Things

Article Details

How to Cite
Irawanto, D. W., Jusak, J., Nabiela , N. Z., & Syaiful, P. O. (2025). Measuring Work Performance from Keyboard and Mouse Use. TEPIAN, 6(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.51967/tepian.v6i2.3302

References

  1. Basakci Calik, B.,Yagci,N.,Oztop, M., & Caglar, D. (2022). Effects of risk factors related to computer use on musculoskeletal pain in office workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(1), 269-274.
  2. Banholzer, N. et al. (2021) ‘Computer mouse movements as an indicator of work stress: Longitudinal observational field study’, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2196/27121.
  3. Buschek, D., Bisinger, B., & Alt, F. (2018, April). ResearchIME: A mobile keyboard application for studying free typing behaviour in the wild. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14).
  4. De Jong, M., Bonvanie, A. M., Jolij, J., & Lorist, M. M. (2020). Dynamics in typewriting performance reflect mental fatigue during real-life office work. PLoS One, 15(10), e0239984
  5. Ding, Y., Cao, Y., Duffy, V. G., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Measurement and identification of mental workload during simulated computer tasks with multimodal methods and machine learning. Ergonomics, 63(7), 896-908.
  6. Emerson, S., Emerson, K., & Fedorczyk, J. (2021). Computer workstation ergonomics: Current evidence for evaluation, corrections, and recommendations for remote evaluation. Journal of Hand Therapy, 34(2), 166-178.
  7. Gibbs, M., Mengel, F., & Siemroth, C. (2021). Work from home & productivity: Evidence from personnel & analytics data on IT professionals. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper, (2021-56).
  8. Gunasekaran, K., Kumar, V. V., Kaladevi, A. C., Mahesh, T. R., Bhat, C. R., & Venkatesan, K. (2023). Smart decision-making and communication strategy in industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 11, 28222-28235
  9. Griggio, C. F., Sato, A. J., Mackay, W. E., & Yatani, K. (2021, May). Mediating intimacy with dearboard: a co-customizable keyboard for everyday messaging. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16).
  10. Hedge, A., & Evans, S. J. (2001). Ergonomic management software and work performance: an evaluative study. Cornell University Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report/RP2501, Ithaca, NY.
  11. Huu, P.T. (2023) ‘Impact of employee digital competence on the relationship between digital autonomy and innovative work behavior: a systematic review’, Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(12), pp. 14193–14222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10492-6.
  12. Islam, A. N., Whelan, E., & Brooks, S. (2021). Does multitasking computer self-efficacy mitigate the impact of social media affordances on overload and fatigue among professionals?. Information Technology & People, 34(5), 1439-1461.
  13. Kar, G., & Hedge, A. (2021). Effect of workstation configuration on musculoskeletal discomfort, productivity, postural risks, and perceived fatigue in a sit-stand-walk intervention for computer-based work. Applied Ergonomics, 90, 103211.
  14. Kołodziej, M., Tarnowski, P., Sawicki, D. J., Majkowski, A., Rak, R. J., Bala, A., & Pluta, A. (2020). Fatigue detection caused by office work with the use of EOG signal. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(24), 15213-15223.
  15. Lin, M. I. B., Hong, R. H., & Huang, Y. P. (2020). Influence of virtual keyboard design and usage posture on typing performance and muscle activity during tablet interaction. Ergonomics, 63(10), 1312-1328.
  16. Lin, C.J. and Canny, S. (2024) ‘Investigating the effect of key size, typing angle, and typing technique of virtual keyboard on typing productivity, biomechanics, and usability in a mixed reality environment’, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 191(November 2023). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103339.
  17. Lourenço, M. L., & Coelho, D. A. (2017). Performance evaluation of PC mice. In Occupational Safety and Hygiene V (pp. 169-174). CRC Press.
  18. Mikkelsen, S., Vilstrup, I., Lassen, C. F., Kryger, A. I., Thomsen, J. F., & Andersen, J. H. (2007). Validity of questionnaire self-reports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage during a four-week period. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64(8), 541-547
  19. Munirathinam, S. (2020). Industry 4.0: Industrial internet of things (IIOT). In Advances in computers (Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 129-164). Elsevier
  20. Nagayoshi, S. and Nakamura, J. (2024) ‘Impact of Computer Usage on Organizational Memory and Learning from Failure: A Case Study of a Japanese Company’, The Review of Socionetwork Strategies [Preprint], (0123456789). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-024-00163-5.
  21. Nuskiya, A.F. (2018) ‘The Effect of Information Technology on Employees’ Performance in the Banking Industry in Sri Lanka.’, European Journal of Business and Management, 10(16), pp. 47-52–52.
  22. Oke, A. E., Arowoiya, V. A., & Akomolafe, O. T. (2022). Influence of the Internet of Things’ application on construction project performance. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(13), 2517-2527.
  23. Pimenta, A., Carneiro, D., Novais, P., & Neves, J. (2013). Monitoring mental fatigue through the analysis of keyboard and mouse interaction patterns. In Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems: 8th International Conference, HAIS 2013, Salamanca, Spain, September 11-13, 2013. Proceedings 8 (pp. 222-231). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  24. Pitoyo, D. and Suharyanto (2019) ‘The Application of Information Technology, Knowledge and Skill and the Impacts to Employee Performance’, TSSA 2019 - 13th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications, Proceedings, pp. 82–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA48701.2019.8985500.
  25. Shi, Z., Xie, Y., Xue, W., Chen, Y., Fu, L., & Xu, X. (2020). Smart factory in Industry 4.0. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(4), 607-617.
  26. Tang, C. P., Huang, T. C. K., & Wang, S. T. (2018). The impact of Internet of things implementation on firm performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2038-2053.