Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 27, 2023
Accepted
December 31, 2023
Published
December 31, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 58 Download : 36

Main Article Content

Abstract

Grass is a one-piece plant with thin, tapering leaves that grow from the base of the stem. Grass is one of the most common types of plants on earth, but not all types are the same. Some need regular care, while others can grow without ever being touched. There are various types of grass, but only a few types of grass are suitable as ornamental plants. Currently, garden construction service providers still use a manual system to determine the type of grass, so errors can occur, resulting in damage to the garden and a decrease in the artistic value and selling price of the grass. A technology can help determine the type of grass for making a garden, namely a decision support system. This system was built on a web basis using the Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis method to recommend types of grass for making gardens. This research uses 17 types of grass as alternative data and five selection criteria, namely leaf shape, growth rate, weather resistance, leaf color, care, leaf texture and price per meter. This method's research shows Japanese grass as the best alternative with the highest optimization value, namely -0.02499. The results of system validation using the Confusion Matrix method to compare system calculations with manual calculations obtained an accuracy value of 71%.

Keywords

Decision Support System, Grass Selection, Garden, Multi-Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis, Confusion Matrix

Article Details

How to Cite
Astuti, I. F., Najib, N., Rosmasari, Dedy Cahyadi, Alex, R. ., & Kridalaksana, A. H. . (2023). Decision Support System on Grass Selection for Gardening Creation Using Multi-Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA). TEPIAN, 4(4), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.51967/tepian.v4i4.2961
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Azhari, S. Q., & Muiz, A. H. (2020). Pertamanan Di Masjid Roudhotul Musyaawaroh. Jurnal Masjiduna : Jurnal Ilmiah Stidki Ar-Rahmah, 3(1), 52–62.
  2. Efendi, C. N. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Rumput Terbaik Metode SAW (Issue December).
  3. Fadlan, C., Windarto, A. P., & Damanik, I. S. (2019). Penerapan Metode MOORA pada Sistem Pemilihan Bibit Cabai (Kasus: Desa Bandar Siantar Kecamatan Gunung Malela). Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing, 3(2), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v3i2.1324
  4. Kumurur, V. A. (1998). Rumput Lansekap untuk lapangan olahraga, taman, dan areal parkir (Issue September 1998).
  5. Muharsyah, A., Hayati, S. R., Setiawan, M. I., Nurdiyanto, H., & Yuhandri. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Jurnalis Menerapkan MultiObjective Optimization On The Basis Of Ratio Analysis (MOORA). Jurnal Riset Komputer (JURIKOM), 5(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.30645/j-sakti.v2i2.79
  6. Nababan, L., & Sinambela, L. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kelayakan Bedah Rumah Keluarga Miskin Menggunakan Metode Moora. Jurnal Teknik Informatika Kaputama (JTIK), Vol.02(2), 20–27.
  7. Nurhayati, D. R. (2020). Tata Taman (Junaedi (ed.); Pertama). Universitas Slamet Riyadi.
  8. Pertiwi, I. P., Fedinandus, F., & Limantara, A. D. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting. CAHAYAtech, 8(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.47047/ct.v8i2.46
  9. Pratama, D. (2022). Analisis Strategi Pemasaran Untuk Penjualan Tanaman Hias Rumput Gajah Mini Variegata di Kelurahan Sei Agul Kecamatan Medan Barat Kota Medan. 2, 1–17.
  10. Proboningrum, S., & Sidauruk, A. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Kain Dengan Metode Moora. JSiI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 8(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsii.v8i1.3073
  11. Rahayu, S., & Sinaga, A. S. R. (2018). Penerapan Metode Naive Bayes Dalam Pemilihan Kualitas Jenis Rumput Taman CV. Rumput Kita Landscape. Digital Zone: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 9(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.31849/digitalzone.v9i2.1942
  12. Ridwan, D. A., & Rahman, B. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Penerimaan Raskin (Beras Miskin) Pada Kecamatan Kendari Barat Menggunakan Metode Analythical Hierarchi Process (AHP). Simtek : Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Teknik Komputer, 4(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.51876/simtek.v4i1.45
  13. Saribu, E. V. B. D., & Marbun, M. (2020). Penerapan Metode Topsis Pada Sistem Pendukung. 4(1), 49–53.
  14. Setiaji, A. (2021). Pengantar Desain Taman (K. Syukur (ed.); I). DIVA Press.
  15. Virgiant, R. B., & Rochmawati, N. (2022). Implementasi Metode MOORA Untuk Penentuan Wisata Surabaya Terbaik Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Journal of Informatics and Computer Science (JINACS), 3(03), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.26740/jinacs.v3n03.p267-277