Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 8, 2024
Accepted
December 22, 2024
Published
December 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the differences in soil chemical properties in horticultural crops and oil palm plantations in Central Kalimantan. The research was conducted in Kalampangan (horticulture) and Tumbang Nusa (oil palm) using quantitative analysis. Soil samples were taken at a depth of 0-30 cm with a soil drill, and data were analyzed by regression and correlation using Microsoft Excel 2022 presented in tables and graphs. The results showed that the chemical properties of peat in the mustard field were classified as low with a pH of 3,98 (very acidic), C-organic content of 53,5% (very high), ash content of 6,3% (low) and moisture content of 159.56% (high). The chemical properties of the peat in the corn field were low with a pH of 3,84 (very acidic), a C-organic content of 54,1% (very high), an ash content of 5.5% (low) and a moisture content of 216,04% (high). The chemical properties of the peat on the oil palm land were low with a pH of 3,41 (very acidic), a C-organic content of 57,5% (very high), an ash content of 0.8% (low) and a moisture content of 242,07% (high). Based on the results of the Correlation Test at the Kalampangan and Tumbang Nusa locations, it was found that there was no difference in the strength of the relationship between variables in both Kalampangan and Tumbang Nusa. Regression test results show that the relationship between C-organic and ash content is negative (opposite). The relationship between C-organic and moisture content is positive (unidirectional). The relationship between C-organic and soil pH is negative (opposite). The relationship between pH and ash content is positive (unidirectional). The relationship between pH and water content is negative (opposite). The relationship between water content and ash content is negative (opposite). The results of the T test on soil pH, C-organic and ash content showed that there was a significant difference between horticultural crops and oil palm plantations, while the results of the T test on soil water content showed that there was no significant difference between horticultural crops and oil palm plantations.

Keywords

Soil Fertility Peat Chemical Properties Horticultural Crops Plantation Crops

Article Details

References

  1. Agus, F., K. Hairiah, dan A. Mulyani. (2011). Peingukuran Cadangan Karbon Tanah Gambut. World Agroforeistry Ceintrei dan Balai Beisar Peineilitian dan Peingeimbangan Sumbeirdaya Lahan Peirtanian. Bogor. 58 hal.
  2. Alwi, M. (2006). Peirubahan Keimasaman Tanah Gambut Dangkal Akibat Peimbeirian Bahan Ameilioran. Jurnal Tanah Tropikal, 12 (2), 77 – 83.
  3. Asmi, S., Munawar K, Sufardi. (2021). Evaluasi Cadangan Karbon Tanah Pada Beirbagai Tipei Peinggunaan Lahan Keiring Di Keicamatan Blang Bintang Kabupatein Aceih Beisar. Jurnal Ilmiah. 6 (2),1332 – 1338.
  4. Barchia, M.F. (2009). Agroeikosisteim Tanah Mineiral Masam. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Univeirsity Preiss.
  5. Dariah, A., Maftuah. E, dan Maswar. (2014). Karakteiristik Lahan Gambut. Dalam: Panduan Peingeilolaan Beirkeilanjutan Lahan Gambut Teirdeigradasi. Balai Beisar Peineilitian dan Peingeimbangan Sumbeirdaya Lahan Peirtanian, Badan Peineilitian dan Peingeimbangan Peirtanian Keimeinteirian Peirtanian.
  6. Harianja, B.N. (2018). Kajian Karakteiristik Kimia Gambut Dan Karbon Organik Teirlarut Pada Peinggunaan Lahan Yang Beirbeida. Skripsi. Fakultas Peirtanian, Univeirsitas Palangka Raya.
  7. Jaya, A., J.O. Rieileiy, T. Artiningsih, Y. Sulistiyanto, dan Y. Jagau. 2001. Peimanfaatan lahan gambut tropika dalam untuk peirtanian di Kalimantan Teingah, Indoneisia. Jurnal Peineilitian Tanah dan Air. hlm 125-131. Dalam Rieileiy, J.O., dan S.E. Pagei (Eds.). Prosiding Simposium Jakarta Lahan Gambut untuk Rakyat: Fungsi Sumbeirdaya Alam dan Peingeilolaan Beirkeilanjutan.
  8. Munawar, A. (2018). Keisuburan Tanah Dan Nutrisi Tanaman. PT Peineirbit IPB Preiss.
  9. Noor, M. (2001). Peirtanian Lahan Gambut: Poteinsi dan Keindala. Kanisius. Yogyakarta
  10. Nugroho, T. C., Oksana, Dan E. Aryanti. (2013). Analisis Sifat Kimia Tanah Gambut Yang Di Konveirsi Meinjadi Peirkeibunan Keilapa Sawit Di Kabupatein Kampar. Jurnal Agroteiknologi, 4, 25 – 30.
  11. Oksana, Irfan, Huda M. (2012). Peingaruh Alih Fungsi Lahan Hutan Meinjadi Peirkeibunan Keilapa Sawit Teirhadap Sifat Kimia Tanah. Jurnal Agroforeistri, 3(1), 29 – 34.
  12. Pusat Peineilitian Tanah. (1983). Kriteiria Peinilaian Data Analisis Sifat Kimia Tanah. Deiparteimein Peirtanian Bogor.
  13. Pinatih, I. D. A. Sri Purnami, Tati, B. K., dan Keitut, D. S. (2015). Evaluasi status keisuburan tanah pada lahan peirtanian di Keicamatan Deinpasar Seilatan. Jurnal Agroeikoteiknologi Tropika 4(4): 282-292.
  14. Rahmah, Yusran, Umar. (2014). Sifat Kimia Tanah Di Beirbagai Tipei Peinggunaan Lahan Di Deisa Bobo Keicamatan Palolo Kabupatein Sigi. Jurnal Warta Rimba, 2(1), 88 – 95.
  15. Ratmini, S. (2012). Karakteiristik dan Peingeilolaan Lahan Gambut untuk Peingeimbangan Peirtanian. Paleimbang. Balai Peingkajian Teiknologi Peirtanian (BPTP) Sumateira Seilatan. Jurnal Lahan Suboptimal, 1(2), 197- 206.
  16. Rini, N. Hazli., S. Hamzar, dan B.P. Teiguh. (2009). Peimbeirian Fly Ash pada lahan gambut untuk meireiduksi asam humat dan kaitannya teirhadap kalsium (Ca) dan magneisium (Mg). Jurnal Teiroka, 9 : 143-154.
  17. Riwandi. 2003. Indikator Stabilitas Gambut Beirdasarkan Analisis Keihilangan Karbon Organik, Sifat Fisikokimia dan Komposisi Bahan Gambut. Jurnal Peineilitian UNIB. Beingkulu.
  18. Sasli, I. (2011). Karakteirisasi gambut deingan beirbagai bahan ameilioran dan peingaruhnya teirhadap sifat fisik dan kimia guna meindukung produktivitas lahan gambut. Univeirsitas Tanjungpura. Jurnal agrovigor, 4 (1) : 42-50.
  19. Seitiadi, I. C. Yulianti, N. dan Adji, F.F. (2016). Evaluasi Sifat Kimia Dan Fisik Gambut Dari Beibeirapa Lokasi Di Blok C Eks-Plg Kalimantan Teingah. Univeirsitas Palangka Raya. Jurnal AGRI PEAT, 17 (2), 67-78.